You are here:
Sam Harris is an atheist, secularist (from a Jewish background). He has been appropriately labelled "Seditious Sam" due to his advice to fellow militants not to overtly identify themselves as atheists (in their efforts to proselytize the masses to the naturalist religion), recognizing this is harmful to their cause. Sam Harris is big on the moral argument and the logical issues pertaining to evil. However, his positioning in this subject is contradicted by the negation (in Naturalism, Atheism, Materialism) of any objective, absolute good or evil. His moral objections, and those of his fellow atheists, are based (according to their world view) purely on the blind forces of physics and random undirected processes and thus, they cannot coherently sustain any moral argument without facing logical and rational inconsistencies. Ultimately, these types of "moral" objections by atheists like Harris have as much worth, significance and consequence as the dust that Harris will eventually transform into through the "blind forces of physics" after he is buried six feet under the ground. The "blind forces of physics" don't give a jack about morals (or anything else) in this apparently purposeless, meaningless, directionless cosmos, so why should these blind directionless forces care about the opinions of whining atheists like Sam, Rich, Dan or Chris?