You are here: Home Basics

Over the past 50 years huge advancements in astronomy, physics, molecular biology and genetics and the gradual closing gap between technological and biological systems have eroded the arguments previously used to undermine belief in God. Rather, arguments that were thought to have been totally undermined (such as the teleological argument) have received powerful invigoration through such advances and are now much harder to dismiss compared to the days of a clockwork (mechanical) universe, Darwinian notions of cells and primeval soups. Seeing the rise in the case for a knowing, willing, powerful creator, and the increasing challenges posed to atheism, a militant wing has appeared to "save the masses" and keep them within the fold of naturalist superstition (matter creates itself and self-organizes through random undirected processes). Their aggressive polemic is not free of question-begging, double-standards, misinformation, distortion and refutation of straw-man arguments to avoid addressing the actual arguments and issues.

There is an innate and intuitive element inherent in every person that automatically recognizes the rational intelligibility of the universe and naturally affirms that there is a creator behind it (see here). For this reason, not even an atheist can escape using teleological language (language that implies design) in describing life and the universe. This innate, intuitive element is known as the fitrah (الفطرة) and it has been alluded to in the Islamic texts. We will be expanding and exploring this subject area and its consequences in this section.

New Atheists
The Atheist Clinic

Latest Articles
'Who Created God?' Is an Illegitimate and Impossible Question Based Upon Confusion Between Categories
Materialism, Naturalism, Atheism Are Corruptions of Human Nature
Evidences of Rubūbiyyah: 'Cells Work Just Like Computers'
Chance, Probability and Atheists
Keeping a Stationary Earth Moving Through Imaginary Physics and Propping Up the Cosmic Religion of Giordano Bruno
2019 Templeton Prize Winner: Atheism Is Inconsistent With the Scientific Method
Evidences of Rubūbiyyah: Proteins Have 'Zip-Codes' (Postcodes) Which Determine Their Destinations
Why Naturalists, Materialists and Atheists Are Scared of 'Design in Nature' and 'Machine Metaphor'
Evidences of Rubūbiyyah: An Insect With Functional Gears in Its Legs
The Clinic: How Psychologically Insecure Atheists Comfort Themselves - Part 1

No pages found.

Most Popular
Caution Against Muslim Apologists: Zakir Naik, the Big Bang and the Qur'an
A Muslim's Guide to Naturalism, Atheism and Evolution
Planck Satellite Data, Lawrence Krauss and the Earth at the Center of the Universe
The Quran, the Sunnah and Modern Astronomy: Observations on the Solar System of the Astrologers
Evidences of Rubūbiyyah: Bioengineers Create Circuit Board Modelled on Human Brain
Ibn Taymiyyah on the Reasoning of the Atheist
Qur'anic Evidences for the Motion of the Sun and the Phenomena of Night and Day
The Three Levels of the Atheist Pyramid and the Naturalist (Materialist) Religion
The Methods and Routes to Affirmation of a Maker Are Innumerable and Not Restricted
Understanding the Two Definitions of 'Science' in Operation

Archives (View more)
2019 • July
2019 • June
2019 • May
2019 • April
2019 • March
2019 • February
2018 • December
2018 • November
2018 • October
2018 • January
2017 • February
2016 • February